Every number here has a receipt

The two data tiers

Every KYC threshold and withdrawal time on this site carries one of two labels:

• verified — we did it ourselves with our own funds. There is a transaction ID, a timestamped screenshot, and an entry in our test log behind the figure.
• reported — sourced from the casino's official documentation or from documented player cases (forum threads, complaint platforms), always with the source cited. Reported data is a starting point; it gets replaced by verified data as our test cycles cover it.

We never mix the two silently. If you see a number without a label or a source, that's a bug — tell us and we'll fix it or pull it.

The withdrawal test protocol

1. Registration audit. We open the account ourselves and record every field the sign-up form requires: email only? Phone? Country declaration? This becomes the "registration friction" score.
2. Deposit. A real deposit of around $50 in Litecoin, plus a control deposit in USDT on TRON — the two networks anonymous players actually use, because fees are cents and confirmations take minutes.
3. Play-through. We wager enough to satisfy any deposit turnover rule, and we document whether such a rule exists at all — unannounced turnover requirements are a classic payout-delay excuse.
4. Withdrawal, timed. Two tranches: one small (~$30), one for the remaining balance. For each we log four timestamps: withdrawal requested → casino approved → transaction broadcast on-chain → first confirmation. The casino controls the first two gaps; the blockchain controls the rest. We score casinos only on what they control.
5. Proof. The transaction ID and timestamped screenshots are archived. Public entries in the Withdrawal Speed Index link the txid where it can't deanonymize our accounts.

KYC trigger probing

Verification thresholds are the industry's worst-documented number — casinos advertise "no KYC" and bury the triggers in terms-of-service legalese. We track them two ways. The reported layer aggregates official documentation and documented player cases into the KYC Trigger Report. The verified layer comes from our own accounts: as our withdrawal volume on each casino grows across test cycles, we record the exact point where a verification prompt appears — or doesn't.

Test cadence

Top-ranked casinos get re-tested weekly with micro-withdrawals; the rest of the tracked list is re-tested at least monthly. The index shows both the latest run and the median across runs, because a casino that pays in five minutes on Tuesday and five hours on Saturday should rank like a five-hour casino.

What we refuse to publish

• Invented ratings, star counts or "player review" quotes we can't source;
• Aggregate rating schema markup without real, countable reviews behind it;
• Bonus values copied from other affiliate sites without checking the casino itself;
• Positive-only results. Slow payouts, surprise KYC walls and stalled reviews get published with the same prominence as the good numbers — that's the point of the site.

Conflicts of interest, stated plainly

Some outbound links are affiliate links (full disclosure). The ranking methodology — withdrawal speed 40%, KYC policy 30%, networks and fees 15%, fairness verifiability 15% — is fixed before commercial conversations happen, and no casino can pay to change its test results. A casino that stops paying us commission stays in the index with its data intact; a casino that fails tests ranks last no matter what it pays. The broader editorial rules — corrections policy included — live on the about page.